請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
版主: 版主013
-
- CR
- 文章: 945
- 註冊時間: 週二 4月 14, 2009 5:49 pm
-
- 註冊會員
- 文章: 11
- 註冊時間: 週二 2月 23, 2010 10:55 pm
Re: 請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
case by caselien897398 寫:請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
2個都不強
-
- R1
- 文章: 123
- 註冊時間: 週一 1月 04, 2010 3:48 pm
-
- R3
- 文章: 355
- 註冊時間: 週三 5月 14, 2008 9:54 pm
Re: 請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
你亂講,沒變啦vongreen6 寫:我覺得ADALAT OROS 30mg 比較強
好像調降藥價後 連原廠藥藥效也變差了?! (咦)
我就是吃這郭的
-
- V4
- 文章: 4036
- 註冊時間: 週三 6月 06, 2007 8:25 pm
Re: 請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
您的意思是進口廠商把國外的不良品賣到健保價超低的呆丸嗎?vongreen6 寫:我覺得ADALAT OROS 30mg 比較強
好像調降藥價後 連原廠藥藥效也變差了?! (咦)
(咦) (咦)
-
- V4
- 文章: 4516
- 註冊時間: 週一 11月 13, 2006 5:24 am
-
- CR
- 文章: 643
- 註冊時間: 週六 9月 16, 2006 1:28 pm
Re: 請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
Felodipine 5mg !!lien897398 寫:請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
-
- 註冊會員
- 文章: 78
- 註冊時間: 週五 11月 27, 2009 7:37 am
- phenicol
- V1
- 文章: 1791
- 註冊時間: 週五 8月 18, 2006 11:27 pm
Re: 請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
因該說請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個價差好?
我來亂的
我來亂的
想當年:牙如鐵;生嚼牛筋不用刀
現如今:只吃豆腐和豬血
想當年:一夜三次不用歇
現如今:三月一次用手捏
想當年:頂風尿十丈
現如今:順風尿一鞋
現如今:只吃豆腐和豬血
想當年:一夜三次不用歇
現如今:三月一次用手捏
想當年:頂風尿十丈
現如今:順風尿一鞋
Re: 請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
http://www.nature.com/ajh/journal/v11/n ... 8102a.html
Abstract
Amlodipine and felodipine are calcium antagonists of the dihydropyridine type. The elimination half-life of amlodipine is longer than that of felodipine.
To study whether the different elimination rates of the drugs were reflected in different duration of blood pressure (BP) control, we compared amlodipine and felodipine extended release (ER) by both conventional clinic BP 24 h after drug intake and 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), with special reference to nighttime and morning blood pressure.
Two hundred and sixteen patients with primary hypertension (supine diastolic BP, 95 to 115 mm Hg) were randomized to receive amlodipine or felodipine ER in a multicenter study.
The starting dose of both drugs was 5 mg.
If the target clinic diastolic BP (90 mm Hg) had not been achieved after 4 weeks the dose was increased to 10 mg. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was performed with the subjects taking placebo medication before randomization and after 4 and 8 weeks undergoing active treatment.
Significantly more patients responded after 4 weeks of treatment with amlodipine (50%) as compared with felodipine (33%) (P = .013).
ABPM during daytime (07:00 to 23:00) was similar during both treatments, but nighttime systolic (P = .026) and diastolic (P = .019) BP was more effectively reduced by amlodipine than by felodipine.
After 8 weeks 82% achieved the target pressure with amlodipine and 69% with felodipine (P = .036 for the difference).
Amlodipine seems to be more effective than felodipine when the drugs are compared in the same dose, with regard to the effect on clinic BP 24 h after dosing and to ambulatory BP during the night.
The longer elimination half-life of amlodipine as compared to felodipine is the probable reason for this finding.
Abstract
Amlodipine and felodipine are calcium antagonists of the dihydropyridine type. The elimination half-life of amlodipine is longer than that of felodipine.
To study whether the different elimination rates of the drugs were reflected in different duration of blood pressure (BP) control, we compared amlodipine and felodipine extended release (ER) by both conventional clinic BP 24 h after drug intake and 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), with special reference to nighttime and morning blood pressure.
Two hundred and sixteen patients with primary hypertension (supine diastolic BP, 95 to 115 mm Hg) were randomized to receive amlodipine or felodipine ER in a multicenter study.
The starting dose of both drugs was 5 mg.
If the target clinic diastolic BP (90 mm Hg) had not been achieved after 4 weeks the dose was increased to 10 mg. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was performed with the subjects taking placebo medication before randomization and after 4 and 8 weeks undergoing active treatment.
Significantly more patients responded after 4 weeks of treatment with amlodipine (50%) as compared with felodipine (33%) (P = .013).
ABPM during daytime (07:00 to 23:00) was similar during both treatments, but nighttime systolic (P = .026) and diastolic (P = .019) BP was more effectively reduced by amlodipine than by felodipine.
After 8 weeks 82% achieved the target pressure with amlodipine and 69% with felodipine (P = .036 for the difference).
Amlodipine seems to be more effective than felodipine when the drugs are compared in the same dose, with regard to the effect on clinic BP 24 h after dosing and to ambulatory BP during the night.
The longer elimination half-life of amlodipine as compared to felodipine is the probable reason for this finding.
-
- V1
- 文章: 1068
- 註冊時間: 週二 7月 28, 2009 8:15 pm
Re: 請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
哈哈哈MK 寫:http://www.nature.com/ajh/journal/v11/n ... 8102a.html
Abstract
Amlodipine and felodipine are calcium antagonists of the dihydropyridine type. The elimination half-life of amlodipine is longer than that of felodipine.
To study whether the different elimination rates of the drugs were reflected in different duration of blood pressure (BP) control, we compared amlodipine and felodipine extended release (ER) by both conventional clinic BP 24 h after drug intake and 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), with special reference to nighttime and morning blood pressure.
Two hundred and sixteen patients with primary hypertension (supine diastolic BP, 95 to 115 mm Hg) were randomized to receive amlodipine or felodipine ER in a multicenter study.
The starting dose of both drugs was 5 mg.
If the target clinic diastolic BP (90 mm Hg) had not been achieved after 4 weeks the dose was increased to 10 mg. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was performed with the subjects taking placebo medication before randomization and after 4 and 8 weeks undergoing active treatment.
Significantly more patients responded after 4 weeks of treatment with amlodipine (50%) as compared with felodipine (33%) (P = .013).
ABPM during daytime (07:00 to 23:00) was similar during both treatments, but nighttime systolic (P = .026) and diastolic (P = .019) BP was more effectively reduced by amlodipine than by felodipine.
After 8 weeks 82% achieved the target pressure with amlodipine and 69% with felodipine (P = .036 for the difference).
Amlodipine seems to be more effective than felodipine when the drugs are compared in the same dose, with regard to the effect on clinic BP 24 h after dosing and to ambulatory BP during the night.
The longer elimination half-life of amlodipine as compared to felodipine is the probable reason for this finding.
好 (樂奔) 打針
- mhsing
- CR
- 文章: 756
- 註冊時間: 週四 11月 13, 2008 9:06 am
Re: 請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
健保局的看法是lien897398 寫:請問, Felodipine 5mg和 Norvasc 5mg 哪一個降壓效果好?
哪個便宜就哪個效果好
跟家人吃飯重要